dark

航空兵-官方預告片

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0



1862年，敢死隊的氣球飛行員阿米莉亞·雷恩（Felicity Jones）與開創性的氣象學家詹姆斯·格萊舍爾（埃迪·雷德梅恩（Eddie Redmayne））合作，增進了人類對天氣的了解，並飛越了歷史上任何人。在打破記錄並推進科學發現的過程中，他們的航行到了生命的最邊緣，這幫助不太可能的一對找到自己在世界中所佔的位置，而他們已經遠遠落後於他們。但是，隨著上升成為生存之戰，他們在稀薄的空氣中面臨著身體和情感上的挑戰。
 
»現在以您的主要會員身份獨家觀看Aeronauts：http：//bit.ly/TheAeronautsPrimeVideo
»訂閱：http://bit.ly/PrimeVideoSubscribe

關於航空兵：
費利西蒂·瓊斯（Felicity Jones）和埃迪·雷德梅恩（Eddie Redmayne）在傑克·索恩（Jack Thorne）創作的驚心動魄的戲劇中重聚。成立於1862年的《航空兵》追隨了富有的年輕寡婦阿米莉亞·雷恩（Jones）和頑強的科學家詹姆斯·格萊舍（Redmayne），他們展開了一次熱氣球探險，飛得比歷史上任何人都要高。這是一條通往生存邊緣的旅程，那裡空氣稀薄，生存機會渺茫。當他們危險的攀爬揭示出他們真正的自我時，這對不可能的夫婦發現了彼此之間以及彼此之間的事物，這有助於他們每個人在自己所落後的世界中找到自己的位置。

關於Prime Video：
想現在看嗎？知道了可以立即播放本周的最新電影，昨晚的電視節目，經典的收藏夾等內容，並且所有視頻都存儲在視頻庫中。超過150,000部電影和電視劇集，包括數千個Amazon Prime會員，無額外費用。
 
獲取更多主要視頻：
立即直播：http://bit.ly/WatchMorePrimeVideo
面子書：http://bit.ly/PrimeVideoFB
推特：http://bit.ly/PrimeVideoTW
Instagram：http：//bit.ly/AmazonPrimeVideoIG
 
航空兵-官方預告片

 
頭等視頻
https://www.youtube.com/PrimeVideo。

48 comments

  5. Pity it was a bloke and not a woman talk about rewriting history what a disgrace for his family. If this is the modern world you can keep it. What's up don't you have a famous woman to write about. You have to steal a guys bravery.

  8. I experienced a rather uncomfortable fear of heights because of some of the scenes in this movie ..
    I guess I better stay on the ground.

  9. The movie might be good, just don』t understand why they pic Eddie Redmayne as an actor, I spect much more from him, but he always act making a stupid face, is he like that or why all the movies where he act I really feel he makes himself look like dunce even when he said smart things. I find him handsome in some of the shots, but I don』t think he is a good actor. This is my point of view. BTW that makes the movie boring even with all the good photography editions

  11. This was pretty scary to me; just like when I watched Gravity, I had the sensation that I was about to fall out of my seat.

  13. i loved this a lot. some movies don』t need worldchanging extraordinary plot, it』s the characters and dialogues that were fascinating.

  22. This film was made for political reasons and not to preserve the beauty of history.
    There is a difference between taking liberties because of narrative reasons and changing history all together. No one wants to watch a film based on true events in the end getting an alternate history of what happened. It was 2 men not a man and a woman. This was a really interesting time in history but I can't add it to my collection because of this easily avoidable mistake.

  25. This movie is so good, I just watched it recently with my parents, and I just loved it, I would watch it again, it's one of my new favorite movie's now, lol?❤

  27. Just imagine being Coxwell, a few moments before your death, thinking you lived a meaningful life and that you have left your mark in history, only for some Hollywood leftist SJW hypocrite to decide to turn you into a woman just so he can spread his liberal/feminist bullshit agenda all over the world….

  28. Lets replace men with women in biographical films because you know, if we dont we are sexist! lets also throw in an Indian in VICTORIAN England (lmao) just so we can tick off the racist box in our checklist. Also dont forget to throw in a line every 5 minutes belittling women, only to prove them how strong women are. 2020 filmmaking and script writing at its finest! Cant wait for the new Easter holidays films where Jesus is replaced by a female and Mary is a black transgender… good times ahead!

  29. I hate how only people in the US can watch it. I don't have money for a vpn and wasn't able to watch it in a movie theatre. I have searched EVERYWHERE for a dvd but i just can't find it.

  40. I just got done watching this, and it was only pretty good. The problem with it that made it only 'pretty good' is
    because it suffered from 'flashback syndrome'. Just when the story is getting exciting, then suddenly it goes into a flashback which takes you out of the experience, and you lose all interest. This movie would have been GREAT if they would have just started at the beginning of the story and told it straightforward, letting the expectation and the characters build. Flashback Syndrome is a current problem with Hollywood productions lately, and it is a serious problem. Can't ANYONE in Hollywood make a movie anymore and just start at the beginning and tell the story??

  48. Okay, the woke-ness of Hollywood has gone off the rails. I can accept, to a limited extent, adjusting historical films to make them more interesting or exciting, but come on, substituting a woman for a man because it is nice to have women in historical roles is asinine. It was also ridiculous to have a man or a woman climb a rope ladder to the top of the balloon at 37000 feet in subzero temperatures and oxygen deprivation. If you want to portray a women in an important role in this movie why not have the wife of the main character play the critical role that she did in helping him reach his goals. Or even better make a movie about the daring women who actually piloted balloons in the first half of the eighteen hundreds.

    I wonder when they are going to make a movie about the all female battalion that stormed the beaches at Normandy. It would be really good to show strong women in historical roles on D-Day. What about that pilot who led the Doolittle raid … what was her name? Oh yes, Amelia Doolittle I think.

Comments are closed.