暴力會殺死香港的民主運動嗎? |衝突區



民主活動家和香港學生領袖蕭敬騰仍然認為,這個於今年夏天在中國特別行政區街頭出生的運動需要繼續進行示威活動。蕭告訴DW:“是政府迫使我們走上街頭並違反法律。”
示威者與警察之間的衝突變得越來越暴力。最近幾天,親北京立法者何俊ius(Junius Ho)等政客遭到襲擊。
到目前為止,香港的包括肖在內的民主運動人士一直不願意譴責這種暴力行為。
她說:「示威者中的一位負責人沒有分裂,也沒有譴責我們的任何示威者,儘管他們使用的暴力程度似乎正在……升級。」
DW的蒂姆·塞巴斯蒂安(Tim Sebastian)問道,香港的民主運動是否像北京一樣變得僵化和僵化?
「我相信關於香港未來或運動將如何發展的討論正在如火如荼地展開,尤其是在最近幾天,當我們看到暴力升級而我們沒有取得任何成就時……和平手段將是我們解決香港當前局勢的唯一出路。」

https://p.dw.com/p/3SYPH

在我們的播放列表中查看更多視頻:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list …
推特:https://twitter.com/dw_conflictzone
訂閱:https://www.youtube.com/user/deutschewelleenglish?sub_confirmation=1

有關更多新聞,請訪問:http://www.dw.com/en/
在社交媒體上關注DW:
►Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/deutschewellenews/
►推特:https://twitter.com/dwnews
►Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/dw_stories/
在Sie中的德國影片中的視頻:https://www.youtube.com/channel/deutschewelle
#dwZone。

48 comments
  1. If majority of HKer want a new government of their own let them have it and be responsible for it. What is the problem here? Isn't it suppression to have a government that doesn't represent the will of its people?

  2. DW News is a Central European media house and it should be a little more "understanding" to HK situation. Did we forget about our fight for liberty and democracy? Like Hungarian Uprising, Poland, Fall of Berlin Wall etc.

  3. Deliberate attempt by DW to discredit the Hong Kong protestors for their freedoms promised when China took back HKG in 1997 but slowly imposing communist rule.

  4. this young lady can't represent the 200ML HK people. get to the core question, please! why HK people started to protest? how the HK government responded? if Lam made the correct move, the situation would be better. if the KH government agrees to get the free election, HK would have a greater future. ( of course the pro-china people will lose) Now, it is too later! HK is died.

  5. Pls not forget a million and 2 million were participating the procession
    But government did not feedback and still ignoring the citizen voice.

  6. Spoiled brat pretending to be a well exposed & knowledgeable adult just because she speaks better English. ?
    She brought international 『glory』 for herself and parents who brought her up with such values and they must have condoned her nonsense since young! ?

  7. Democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of movement and the rule of law, better future for Hong Kong, all that mention above is not what the rioters is fighting for ?
    Can anyone tell me what are they fighting for ???

  8. This lady is responding like a child…I went to university in HK, back then, some of Childish college students trying to discriminate against mainland students while they have never been to China. Those little dark spots have foreshadowed the storm. This girl has no logic and compassion for those who suffer from the riot.

  9. No. The majority of Hong Kong does not support these radical rioters. And no we are not willing to take the risk of a crackdown.
    This is a really great interview and the interviewer has great questions.

    Joey Siu's answers show us how superficial and short-sighted this group is. Very disappointing and very embarrassed for her.

  10. There are no clear leaders. Just Hong Kong people standing up for themselves and society. Fall of big corporations (including American companies)
    We saw the Hong Kong legislative side fall and failing of universal suffrage. We are seeing the fall of Hong Kong Police. Soon the court system. One by one.

    Government has the press conference. They can host the conference to talk to the people. Over 2 million people showed on the street to walk and protest. The government used force and fear as tactics to scare people to be on the street. The youth are stepping up.

    Why are Hong Kong Police not accountable?

  11. THEY CAME FIRST for the Government,
    and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a government official.

    THEN THEY CAME for the Police,
    and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Policeman.

    THEN THEY CAME for Starbucks,
    and I didn't speak up because I wasn』t a coffee shop owner.

    THEN THEY CAME for the Mandarin-Speaking tourists,
    and I didn't speak up because I was not a tourist.

    THEN THEY CAME for me,
    and by that time no one was left to speak up.

  12. This is a strong and intelligent woman who is trying to bring the topic back to Hong Kong people』s commands. This journalist is trying to win a debate, he is clearly not hearing her.

  13. "I believe" "have to" instead of "we believe", indicating their organization, but "random" violence .. She has totally no idea about the whole things. They seems like against anything even the lawful lawyers, judges or independent investigators from UK, AU, NZ, etc. as long as they do not agree with them. She has no logic thinking, bad wording (too much "i believe", "first of all", etc.).How could she be qualified to a high level education (such as college)?

  14. If we had the internet during the 89 tiananmen people would have seen the sickness on those student protesters leader』s face! One even said she wanted to shed others blood she believes only when bunch of student dies she than can achieve her goal

    And here I』m seeing the same pattern, same brainless young kids doing others betting… I use to be one of them sign

  15. I believe setting a ''pro-Beijing'' old Hong Konger on fire is not a GOOD way to express our freedom of speech but that is because he does not agree with us.

  16. I can't believe this woman could stand out as a representer of Hong Kong. The way she talks, the way she thinks of bitting innocent citizens. She does not represent Hong Kong but terrorism..

  17. I believe l can flay, l believe l can touch the sky, l believe 50 time she said believe until kids say what how much she said l believe

Comments are closed.