1:30 Couldn』t you rewrite the denominator as 2 tines sqrt(3x^2+17x) and then rationalized the denominator to get rid of the square root to get [(6x+17) times sqrt(3x^2+17x)] divided by (6x^2+24x)?
I love you, virtual teacher of the year.
I had to go through this 3* to understand but Hy is helpful. Thank you.
WTF you idiot
aaaaaand this confused me even more.
Can someone explain broader why the f(x)=x raise to 1/2 in the end part?
Thank you so much. Way more efficient than my professor who is teaching us about newtons history rather than get into the calculus.
Dear students out there: !!!!for your f(x) and f prime (x) don't use an x when U substituting. I guarantee you will forget it doesn't remain as an x and has to be substituted.
Why is the outside function x to the 1/2?
great stuff loges!
Wow easiest to understand. Please keep up your good work. You're literally fighting against ignorance ????
Thank you so much. Lifesaver!!
it would be very helpful to have a video on the chain rule.
you digg? Great work! Easy to comprehend.
And I will get 2 marks for this
BLESS YOUR SOUL! THANK YOU!!!
so logical, but you should do one with (25-x^2)^1/2 for -5<x<5 the "<" are also (equal to)'s
thanks perfect sense
Thanks this actually really helped me better understand this
1:30 Couldn』t you rewrite the denominator as 2 tines sqrt(3x^2+17x) and then rationalized the denominator to get rid of the square root to get [(6x+17) times sqrt(3x^2+17x)] divided by (6x^2+24x)?
I love you, virtual teacher of the year.
I had to go through this 3* to understand but Hy is helpful. Thank you.
WTF you idiot
aaaaaand this confused me even more.
Can someone explain broader why the f(x)=x raise to 1/2 in the end part?
Thank you so much. Way more efficient than my professor who is teaching us about newtons history rather than get into the calculus.
Dear students out there:
!!!!for your f(x) and f prime (x) don't use an x when U substituting. I guarantee you will forget it doesn't remain as an x and has to be substituted.
Why is the outside function x to the 1/2?
great stuff loges!
Wow easiest to understand. Please keep up your good work. You're literally fighting against ignorance ????
Thank you so much. Lifesaver!!
it would be very helpful to have a video on the chain rule.
you digg? Great work! Easy to comprehend.
And I will get 2 marks for this
BLESS YOUR SOUL! THANK YOU!!!
so logical, but you should do one with (25-x^2)^1/2 for -5<x<5 the "<" are also (equal to)'s
thanks perfect sense
Thanks this actually really helped me better understand this
what the fuck