dark

5G是武器-5G技術的隱藏軍事用途-隱藏的真相

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0



5 5G可以持續多久？ -真相可能嚇到你

✦如果您遇到困難並且遇到困難，請考慮與我們的合作夥伴BetterHelp進行在線治療會議-https://tryonlinetherapy.com/success

✦!!!對於此視頻中使用的所有內容，我們擁有許可/商業許可。

特別感謝我們的朋友倫敦雷亞爾進行的這次精彩採訪：
https://www.youtube.com/user/LondonRealTV

✦別忘了訂​​閱：https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfYpNHgjytKsTYy-CQ8N5Dg

————————————————– ————————————————– ——
 
✦演講者：David Icke和Brian Rose

————————————————– ————————————————– ——

Audio Audiojungle許可的音樂

————————————————– ————————————————– ——

44 comments

  1. I Never watch TV for several years now. The last smart phone i bought was the Galaxy 1. The only time i have a drink is Christmas / new years week. All because they pushed us so hard I just woke up.

  4. Um… ok… so why has their been anger, depression, societal unrest before the Information Age? Or even before the industrial revolution? Or well documented hundreds and even thousands of years ago? What was the control before 5G? Before 4G, 3G, CB radio, before the very first transmission of any kind? Was it books that were meant to be burned that were more transportable than scrolls and stone tablets? Was it the evil invention of the printing press? Was it the bipedal man that did the first cave painting that disrupted their society and caused the problems of the human condition that have afflicted world peace since time began? I don』t think so… it』s sin that has corrupted the world – it』s got nothing to do with 5G, nor 6G or whatever comes after that. I think you have the right question of 『why』, you』ve just found the wrong answer in the 『what』 and 『how』.

  7. Guys…stop dropping acid. 5G doesn』t cause any harm. Science proves it. Your tinfoil hat theories might be exciting to imagine, but it』s bonkers. If you think it causes harm, I would suggest you turn everything off in your house. And don』t walk outside either, as the UV from the sun causes more harm. Please, do some research and ignore all this conspiracy nonsense.

  16. What will 60 Gigabites of Electromagnetic energy will do to your METALLIC content (iron, Cooper, aluminum, magnesium, etc.) body?

    If you think "Nothing" then try to put your brain inside a microwave and turn it on!

  19. Dear David Icke and Brian Rose, thank you very much for the excellent content upon this topic you have provided! (namely, your censored video, The Coronavirus Conspiracy: How COVID-19 Will Seize Your Rights & Destroy Our Economy)

    Dear people, for those of you who perhaps find 「conspiracy theories」 difficult to accept, believe, self-substantiate, etc., please consider this plain sense, objective criticism of the present 「Covid-19 Pandemic」. My argument shall consider the MORTALITY RATE and sneaky Federal Government legislation regarding MONEY.

    To begin, I am not very technologically literate (in fact, I am a bit of a luddite), so I shall not write about 5G internet technology, but I shall stick to clear facts that are meaningful to myself.

    MORTALITY RATE
    If you conduct a simple search of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) annual 「Causes of Death」 online publications, you will find a glaring discrepancy between:
    1. the past magnitude of deaths caused by INFLUENZA and PNEUMONIA and the fact that NO 「social distancing」 measures, or indeed any other public restrictions, were ever implemented, and
    2. the present nominal Covid-19 (influenza and pneumonia) causes of death (in Australia, 2020) and the fact that extreme public measures have been implemented.
    Thus, on 25 January 2020, Covid-19 arrived in Australia. Since then sixty-one (61) people have died 「after testing positive」. As such, approximately twenty (20) people die each month in connection with Covid-19.

    HOWEVER, the following table illuminates a very obvious objective discrepancy between points 1. and 2., above:
    Influenza and pneumonia – Australian deaths (source ABS)
    YEAR NUMBER RANK (compared with and/or contrast against other death causes)
    2002 3,084 10
    2003 3,566 8
    2004 3,381 9
    2005 3,034 9
    2006 2,711 12
    2007 2,634 13
    2008 1,760 17
    2009 1,790 17
    2010 2,373 15
    2011 2,487 13
    2012 2,719 13
    2013 2,497 15
    2014 2,873 12
    2015 3,042 12
    2016 3,334 11
    2017 4,269 9
    2018 3,102 12

    Put simply, with regard to 2018, alone, approximately two hundred and fifty-eight (258) people died EVERY MONTH from influenza and pneumonia – yet, NO public health restrictions were ever implemented. The Covid-19 「pandemic」 monumentally pales against such numbers.

    Indeed, every year in Australia, the leading cause of death is Ischaemic heart disease, which significantly outstrips other causes of death, but which NEVER attracts public health restrictions (e.g. what manufacturers can and cannot put in our food, etc.). Furthermore, WHILST PUBLIC FEARFUL ATTENTION IS FOCUSSED ON THE Covid-19 「crisis」 (despite far more serious health problems facing Australia), significantly disturbing legislation IS being presently drafted and enacted, sneakily and hastily and without opposition.

    MONEY
    Many Australian institutions are presently refusing CASH transactions: the official narrative states that 「physical cash can transmit Covid-19.」 Stated plainly, what nonsense!

    Of all the contagious and/or infectious diseases circulating annually throughout Australian society, CASH has never been denounced as a disease vector (carrier). For example, according to Hepatitis Australia, as at 2018, 226,612 people suffer from chronic VIRAL Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B is transmissible by physical contact, yet cash has never been restricted consequently.

    So, why is cash being banned, phased out, or refused as legal tender? Consider the three following, connected points:
    1. Negative Interest Rates, then,
    2. Abolition of Cash, and
    3. Bank 「Bail Ins」.
    There are many detailed videos available about these topics, and their PRESENT relevance, but at least think about it this way:
    • From the end of April 2020, the Australian Government shall be significantly supplementing UNEMPLOYMENT payments (e.g. Newstart), amongst other payments (a package greater than three hundred [300] billion dollars),
    • Physical cash is being progressively restricted, and probably shall never recover (because, as the official story shall likely go, 「we would never want Covid-19 to come back!」),

    Thus, people shall have more digitised money in their accounts than ever before, yet cash shall be dying out. In recent history, protests and riots occurred in Greece due to governmental 「austerity measures」 and the prospect of bank 「bail ins」 – indeed, people swarmed upon the banks to draw out their CASH, so that it could not be digitally stolen to pay off bank debt to the their federal reserve.

    But, what happens if there is NO physical currency to withdraw on the eve of a bank 「bail in」?!

    For a reasonable answer, consider the present Australian Senate sitting postponement: only the Cabinet – the Prime Minister (Legislature) and each State Premiere (Executive) – are meeting to draft, read, enact, and/or repeal legislation, WITHOUT any opposition.

    Thus, in recent times (during the Senate and public lockdown measures), some troubling legislation has been enacted by the Cabinet, legislation that progressively restricts CASH movement (on the laughable basis of combating a 「black market economy」) and legislation to enable Australian banks to conduct a BAIL IN.

    For example, The Turnbull-Morrison government sneakily rushed this legislation through Parliament on 14 February 2018, with just eight (8) senators present in the Senate chamber, and without a recorded vote. The chair of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, which conducted an inquiry into the legislation, Senator Jane Hume, insisted to constituents that it was not a 「bail-in law」; Treasury and other agencies stated it was not the 「intention」 of the conversion and write-off provisions of the law to bail in deposits. However, the Cabinet rushed the legislation through the Senate knowing that Pauline Hanson』s One Nation senators intended to move an amendment that explicitly excluded deposits from the law, but were not in the chamber; another senator, Amanda Stoker, has since admitted it is a bail-in law. Since Covid-19 has quickly and recently gained constant media coverage and disproportionate concern, three (3) other Parliamentary Bills have been passed UNILATERALLY (or ex parte).

    Let us hope such legislation is never amended to include customer deposit accounts as NOT exempt from bail in conversion. Read the legislation for yourself, below:
    • Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019 and its Explanatory Memorandum, and
    • Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019, and
    • Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020.

    Covid-19 is NOT what we have been led to believe, it is something much greater: it is – amongst other things – a slick 「illness risk-related」 way to repeal cash, a conduit to implementing a Centralised Bank Digital Currency, WHILST the world is locked away and asleep (fearfully focussed on a contrived crisis), a means to extinguish the less than three (3) percent economic representation of physical currency (cash), and so on.

  20. Dear David Icke and Brian Rose, thank you very much for the excellent content upon this topic you have provided! (namely, your censored video, The Coronavirus Conspiracy: How COVID-19 Will Seize Your Rights & Destroy Our Economy)

    Dear people, for those of you who perhaps find 「conspiracy theories」 difficult to accept, believe, self-substantiate, etc., please consider this plain sense, objective criticism of the present 「Covid-19 Pandemic」. My argument shall consider the MORTALITY RATE and sneaky Federal Government legislation regarding MONEY.

    To begin, I am not very technologically literate (in fact, I am a bit of a luddite), so I shall not write about 5G internet technology, but I shall stick to clear facts that are meaningful to myself.

    MORTALITY RATE
    If you conduct a simple search of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) annual 「Causes of Death」 online publications, you will find a glaring discrepancy between:
    1. the past magnitude of deaths caused by INFLUENZA and PNEUMONIA and the fact that NO 「social distancing」 measures, or indeed any other public restrictions, were ever implemented, and
    2. the present nominal Covid-19 (influenza and pneumonia) causes of death (in Australia, 2020) and the fact that extreme public measures have been implemented.
    Thus, on 25 January 2020, Covid-19 arrived in Australia. Since then sixty-one (61) people have died 「after testing positive」. As such, approximately twenty (20) people die each month in connection with Covid-19.

    HOWEVER, the following table illuminates a very obvious objective discrepancy between points 1. and 2., above:
    Influenza and pneumonia – Australian deaths (source ABS)
    YEAR NUMBER RANK (compared with and/or contrast against other death causes)
    2002 3,084 10
    2003 3,566 8
    2004 3,381 9
    2005 3,034 9
    2006 2,711 12
    2007 2,634 13
    2008 1,760 17
    2009 1,790 17
    2010 2,373 15
    2011 2,487 13
    2012 2,719 13
    2013 2,497 15
    2014 2,873 12
    2015 3,042 12
    2016 3,334 11
    2017 4,269 9
    2018 3,102 12

    Put simply, with regard to 2018, alone, approximately two hundred and fifty-eight (258) people died EVERY MONTH from influenza and pneumonia – yet, NO public health restrictions were ever implemented. The Covid-19 「pandemic」 monumentally pales against such numbers.

    Indeed, every year in Australia, the leading cause of death is Ischaemic heart disease, which significantly outstrips other causes of death, but which NEVER attracts public health restrictions (e.g. what manufacturers can and cannot put in our food, etc.). Furthermore, WHILST PUBLIC FEARFUL ATTENTION IS FOCUSSED ON THE Covid-19 「crisis」 (despite far more serious health problems facing Australia), significantly disturbing legislation IS being presently drafted and enacted, sneakily and hastily and without opposition.

    MONEY
    Many Australian institutions are presently refusing CASH transactions: the official narrative states that 「physical cash can transmit Covid-19.」 Stated plainly, what nonsense!

    Of all the contagious and/or infectious diseases circulating annually throughout Australian society, CASH has never been denounced as a disease vector (carrier). For example, according to Hepatitis Australia, as at 2018, 226,612 people suffer from chronic VIRAL Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B is transmissible by physical contact, yet cash has never been restricted consequently.

    So, why is cash being banned, phased out, or refused as legal tender? Consider the three following, connected points:
    1. Negative Interest Rates, then,
    2. Abolition of Cash, and
    3. Bank 「Bail Ins」.
    There are many detailed videos available about these topics, and their PRESENT relevance, but at least think about it this way:
    • From the end of April 2020, the Australian Government shall be significantly supplementing UNEMPLOYMENT payments (e.g. Newstart), amongst other payments (a package greater than three hundred [300] billion dollars),
    • Physical cash is being progressively restricted, and probably shall never recover (because, as the official story shall likely go, 「we would never want Covid-19 to come back!」),

    Thus, people shall have more digitised money in their accounts than ever before, yet cash shall be dying out. In recent history, protests and riots occurred in Greece due to governmental 「austerity measures」 and the prospect of bank 「bail ins」 – indeed, people swarmed upon the banks to draw out their CASH, so that it could not be digitally stolen to pay off bank debt to the their federal reserve.

    But, what happens if there is NO physical currency to withdraw on the eve of a bank 「bail in」?!

    For a reasonable answer, consider the present Australian Senate sitting postponement: only the Cabinet – the Prime Minister (Legislature) and each State Premiere (Executive) – are meeting to draft, read, enact, and/or repeal legislation, WITHOUT any opposition.

    Thus, in recent times (during the Senate and public lockdown measures), some troubling legislation has been enacted by the Cabinet, legislation that progressively restricts CASH movement (on the laughable basis of combating a 「black market economy」) and legislation to enable Australian banks to conduct a BAIL IN.

    For example, The Turnbull-Morrison government sneakily rushed this legislation through Parliament on 14 February 2018, with just eight (8) senators present in the Senate chamber, and without a recorded vote. The chair of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee, which conducted an inquiry into the legislation, Senator Jane Hume, insisted to constituents that it was not a 「bail-in law」; Treasury and other agencies stated it was not the 「intention」 of the conversion and write-off provisions of the law to bail in deposits. However, the Cabinet rushed the legislation through the Senate knowing that Pauline Hanson』s One Nation senators intended to move an amendment that explicitly excluded deposits from the law, but were not in the chamber; another senator, Amanda Stoker, has since admitted it is a bail-in law. Since Covid-19 has quickly and recently gained constant media coverage and disproportionate concern, three (3) other Parliamentary Bills have been passed UNILATERALLY (or ex parte).

    Let us hope such legislation is never amended to include customer deposit accounts as NOT exempt from bail in conversion. Read the legislation for yourself, below:
    • Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill 2019 and its Explanatory Memorandum, and
    • Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019, and
    • Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020.

    Covid-19 is NOT what we have been led to believe, it is something much greater: it is – amongst other things – a slick 「illness risk-related」 way to repeal cash, a conduit to implementing a Centralised Bank Digital Currency, WHILST the world is locked away and asleep (fearfully focussed on a contrived crisis), a means to extinguish the less than three (3) percent economic representation of physical currency (cash), and so on.

  21. I love you all but this ends today, no more comments as a first step to regaining control. I could get 1K likes for the first time ever on a comment it doesnt matter. Im done. I dont know about you guys but the thought of having 1000 people agree with a statement i made had me feeling powerful in a way but in reality we've become powerless. I gave up video games a while ago i felt great, now Its finally time to #DitchTheSmartphone.

    Peace everyone, get out there and enjoy life for what it is, see ya'll out there✌☝️?

  22. The fear when out in public is palpable, you can feel it, it's in the air. The only way to break it down is to bring in a human element, a simple greeting with a smile (from a distance, you don't want to get shot), seems to shake most people out of it.

  25. This video is an obvious hypnotism made to put you in a Trance and force you to believe false information. No evidence is presented of anything in this video. The man in this video is just saying he is "observing things" then provides to attack 5g without any evidence. Keep in mind we all get 5gbs per second on home wifi. Just make sure you wear your tin foil hat when your anywhere wifi is. And a shotgun just incase the lizard people try to invade

  26. So sad and yet the young is all for this trying to prove this stuff is dangerous and yet many look at you like your a crazy person.. Lord help us open peoples eyes … Such devastating times.. Thank you for sharing God Bless You..

  28. This man is waffling. Zero evidence given on any of the bs he』s speaking. This is pure conspiracy. Who even is this guy? Is he a reputable, reliable and factual source? No. ?

  29. 5G Stands for '5th Generation' a Milimeter-wave is non-ionising (not harmful) like a microwave or literally how your phone or wifi works RIGHT NOW. a microwave and wifi use the SAME frequency, the reason WIFI doesnt cook you like a microwave oven does is because of the POWER, a microwave oven generates 1000 watts while your WIFI ROUTER generates 0.1 Watt. 5G is using a frequency which is in the same band as WIFI, and its LOWER than visible light which you see everyday. if you believe this video, PLEASE go watch a video on the electromagnetic spectrum, because you OBVIOUSLY dont understand how this technology works. THINK FOR YOURSELF AND EDUCATE YOURSELF, THIS IS SO IRONIC.

  30. Dunning-kruger effect: the video. THIS GUY DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM OR WHAT 5G IS. DONT BE A SHEEP AND FALL FOR UNSCIENTIFIC, NON-SENSICAL BULLSHIT LIKE THIS.

  31. It should be easy to confirm whether there's a link between Covid-19 and 5G by comparing location-based data of 5G rollout & Covid-19 cases and comparing them on maps side-by-side, for the last 6 months.

    On neither side of the argument anyone seems to be doing that…

  34. this is the best sience fiction film ive ever seen! People, wake up! this guy is just a athlete he has no experience in Electrical engineering. You can disporove everything he says here!

  35. Why would you guys believe this. Search up David Icke he thinks vaccines allow your body to be completely controlled physically. Furthermore if all that in the video was true then why arent we having riots. By now we should have some. He also thinks coronavirus was meant to get rid of old people. Clearly this is bullcrap.

  36. The only thing that controls me that i can't live without is pussy. I have been without my phone for a whole day. So yeah……

  38. Youtube should remove bullshit conspiracy theory videos because complete idiots should be protected against their own stupidity by not exposing them to absurdities which they are liable to believe precisely because they are idiots.

  39. In all seriousness, the content of this video is a bunch of nonsense 'DNA transmits information', 'we are all transmitters', 'the brain transmits electrical information'. Just a bunch of buzz phrases which have nothing to do with network frequencies. There is no evidence 4G or 5G has any health implications. Don't use 5G because you shouldn't be funding the Chinese Communist Government – that's a far better arguement.

Comments are closed.