水的形狀| 官方預告片| FOX探照燈



現在在數字上:http://bit.ly/ShapeOfWater-Digital現在在4K超高清,藍光和DVD上:http://bit.ly/BuyTheShapeOfWater來自主講故事的人Guillermo del Toro帶來了水的形狀-一部寓言於世的寓言,講述於1962年的美國冷戰時代。在她工作的隱蔽的高安全性政府實驗室中,孤獨的艾麗莎(Sally Hawkins)被困在孤立的生活中。 當Elisa和同事Zelda(Octavia Spencer)發現一項秘密機密實驗時,Elisa的生活將永遠改變。 邁克爾·香農(Michael Shannon),理查德·詹金斯(Richard Jenkins),邁克爾·斯圖爾巴格(Michael Stuhlbarg)和道格·瓊斯(Doug Jones)齊聚一堂。 在我們的網站上訪問「水的形狀」:https://theshapeofwaterthemovie.com就像在FACEBOOK上的「水的形狀」:https://www.facebook.com/theshapeofwater/在TWITTER上關注「水的形狀」:https:// twitter。 com / shapeofwater #TheShapeofWater與Fox Searchlight在線連接訪問Fox Searchlight網站:http://foxsearchlight.com/像FACEBOOK上的Fox Searchlight:https://www.facebook.com/foxsearchlight在TWITTER上關注Fox Searchlight:https:/ /twitter.com/foxsearchlight水的形狀| 官方預告片| FOX Searchlight https://www.youtube.com/user/FoxSearchlight。

25 comments
  1. So Only The Brave Was not nominated because of a Fish? Sure Fucking a Fish is surely worthy to win best picture than a bunch of Firefighters dying like heroes while saving thousands of lives.

  2. Okay, so I just finished this movie after watching the trailer. I thought the movie was pretty interesting but there were a lot of mixed comments about it so I decided to watch it myself and give any other viewers my honest review on the movie. Before starting on the review, I would like to say that everyone's opinions are valid and just because you don't see eye to eye doesn't mean that you can criticize other people's. Now, the movie was good. The production was amazing and the music was awesome. The plot, not so much. I did not feel emotionally touched by the film. I didn't feel connected to the characters and frankly it was quite boring. I would recommend this film to people that don't care a lot about plots and just like the feeling of watching a movie, but I wouldn't say that I would watch this movie again. Once again, I would like to repeat that everyone's opinions are valid and not everyone can see eye to eye on a certain subject.

  3. They were two fish out of water, kindred spirits whose similarity in life transcended the superficial limits that one was a fish man and one was a human woman, real love and connectedness cares nothing for these passing and trivial factors.

  4. People talk about this film promoting bestiality, but it really depends on what you see as a "beast" aka, an animal, and a "human" or sentient, intelligent creature. Can we really call the creature a animal if it possesses a human's intelligence and emotion? If not, does it really count as bestiality?

Comments are closed.