dark

Google搜索如何工作？

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0



嗨，马特，您能解释一下Google的排名和网站评估流程如何从网站的抓取和分析，抓取时间轴，频率，优先级，数据库中的索引和过滤过程开始如何工作。RobertvH，慕尼黑

有一个问题？在我们的网站站长帮助论坛中提问：http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!forum/webmasters

阅读Google员工的出版物：
http://research.google.com/pubs/papers.html

“大型超文本Web搜索引擎剖析”：http://research.google.com/pubs/archive/334.pdf

获得录用并了解更多信息：http://www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/jobs/index.html

希望在这样的视频中回答您的问题吗？在Twitter上关注我们，并在我们提出新问题时寻找公告：http://twitter.com/googlewmc

更多视频：http://www.youtube.com/GoogleWebmasterHelp
网站站长中央博客：http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/
网站管理员中心：http://www.google.com/webmasters。

40 comments

  15. Just a tid bit for yall: If you live with depressed/suicidal people, then this algorithm will severely negatively impact the mental health of anyone who uses the same ssid (ip). Depressed people get a depressed internet with nothing but depressing recommendations to make you even more depressed. But google says it's better, so I can't argue with that.

  23. I don't know why my print is not working. It was before. I don't know what happen. Also I use to have Google Search. I have a Chrome PC and a HP ENVY 4500 All in one Printer.

  32. How does Google Search work … it doesn't. It is obvious that Google ranks the sensational, dramatic, popular, and advertisers that give them $$$ ahead of what is actually relevant. Type in [any large city] weather and you will often get non-weather related dramatic news articles featuring who was shot, went missing, or was killed in a car crash ON THE FIRST PAGE. That has no business being on the 1st page since it is not relevant and has nothing to do with weather. When I was looking for health insurance, I typed in Health Insurance Marketplace and the actual government website came up FIFTH.

    0:59 is laughably wrong, because Duck Duck Go has Google beat.

  40. Reputable or Popular. Not the same thing.

    Popular is easy to quantify, but how do you quantify reputable?

    For example, the CNN of the world and the New York Times of the world, both have being caught pushing false narratives on daily basis. How exactly are they reputable?

    Furthermore a source "reputable" on one area may not be "reputable" on other areas.

    I wouldn't trust a "Scientific American" to give me advice on law. I would trust Cornell. But I wouldn't trust Cornell to give me advice or science.

    Reputable is a subjective term. As it involves who you personally trust.

    Thus what is reputable for you might not be reputable for me. So my guess is whatever your company ideology tells is "reputable" is what your company put as "reputable" in the algorithm.

    Which would explain your company "American Inventors" search results and "Idiot" search results. Your sources are biased on what you determined what is "reputable" and when your "reputable" sources lack integrity, your company algorithm suffers from it.

Comments are closed.