dark

佛羅里達醫生因冠狀病毒失去孩子監護權

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0



法官暫時剝奪了北邁阿密的特蕾莎·格林博士對她4歲女兒的監護權，因為該醫生與COVID-19患者合作。

皮埃爾·泰勒（Pierre Taylor）/邁阿密先驅報（Miami Herald）編輯的視頻

閱讀更多：https://hrld.us/3ehqmc8
 
來自《邁阿密先驅報》的更多內容：
訂閱：https：//www.youtube.com/user/miamiherald
推特：https://twitter.com/MiamiHerald
面子書：https://www.facebook.com/miamiherald/
網站：https://www.miamiherald.com/。

42 comments

  2. She』s an idiot for thinking it』s ok to have custody in the first place right now with her job. Nothing wrong at all here. Good for the father

  3. The headline blows. This is NOT a woman "losing custody" of her child due to her being a doctor. It's about keeping a 4 year old girl SAFE with her already JOINT CUSTODY father. The mother is NOT a victim and any ego bruising over where the daughter lives MUST take a backseat to the medical safety of the child.

  5. I don't see why she should have a problem with this, especially if it's specified "temporarily". There's either something unfair that we don't know about, or she's a narcissist and maybe that's why she's divorced?

  7. How dare they take a 4 YEAR OLD CHILD away from a mother might be infected with or caring a deadly disease when there are fathers not getting to see there children when they aren't caring deadly diseases

  8. That is a family decision. The husband should be there protecting, providing and caring for the wife and family God entrusted him with. Iron shapens iron. Pray and follow the Holy Spirits guidance. He will lead you and your soul will be at peace

  13. so what. we lost our will, our freedom to Donald Trump.thats America when you feel something is yours like your house and then you're told you don't own the land. you're told to sign birth certificate then your signature doesn't matter. it's in their custody. so yeah ✌ don't forget to vote and turn in your census sheets.

  18. Ohh come on seriously she's a nurse she knows everything that she needs to do to keep her daughter safe. Like I get it it's the fear of her getting her daughter sick. But with her being a nurse an a loving mother she's going to go up an beyond to make sure her daughter doesn't get sick !

  24. It wouldn't have had to come to going to court. I personally would have said please we need to keep our child safe and it's safer for her to be with you. Would it be easy hell no but it would be the right thing to do. Many have moved completely out of their houses away from their families to keep them safe

  30. Average age of death by the virus is 79. And unless the child has underlying health issues, there should be no problem with shared custody. This will likely force her to look for a different job, making that hospital lose a doctor who was apparently smart enough to be trusted with covid patients, and make many people with children think twice about med school.

  36. This was a lowdown move for this bastard he's not that concerned he dont want to pay child support he could be the one to get the virus and infect the child karma is a bitch be careful sir you are wrong??

  40. Wow, didn't expect such vitriol in the comments on this. If this was indeed true and that was the sole reason for her losing custody then that judge clearly has overstepped his bounds. Are we separating all essential workers from their children now?

Comments are closed.