讓志願者將自己暴露在COVID-19上以加快疫苗接種速度



經濟學家和諾貝爾經濟學獎獲得者阿爾文·羅斯(Alvin Roth)說:「經濟學家習慣於權衡取捨。」 「看來,至少在道德社區的某些地方,事實並非如此。」 —-訂閱我們的YouTube頻道:https://www.youtube.com/ReasonTV?sub_在Facebook上贊我們:https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magazine在Twitter上關注我們:https:// twitter.com/reason從自由主義者的角度來看,理性是地球上新聞,政治和文化的主要來源。 請訪問reason.com,以獲取傳統媒體和左右舊的民意雜誌無法提供的觀點。 —–如果可以加快疫苗開發速度,您是否允許科學家將您暴露於新型冠狀病毒? 來自160多個國家/地區的近40,000人已簽約表示對此感興趣。 當世界在等待參與者自然接觸病毒的傳統疫苗試驗的結果時,人類挑戰試驗將刻意暴露更年輕的健康志願者的樣本,從而有可能將研究時間縮短數月。 但是這種方法在一些公共衛生官員和生物倫理學家之間引起爭議,因為這種方法允許參與者在沒有萬無一失的搶救療法的情況下將自己的健康置於危險之中。 這場辯論涉及長期的分歧,即是否應允許低風險群體的人們危害自己的健康,以挽救他人的生命,甚至為此而獲得報酬。 「為了節省一天,從道德上講,這是輕而易舉的事,」現年34歲的前公司律師喬什·莫里森(Josh Morrison)說,他創立了非營利組織「 1Day Sooner」來倡導人類挑戰試驗。 通過將疫苗的使用時間縮短一天,他估計全球可以挽救4,500條生命,這還不包括對其他疾病的醫療,自殺和貧困等產生的次級影響。 莫里森通過努力解決腎臟短缺的問題,參與了挑戰試驗。 在2011年向自己的陌生人捐贈腎臟後,他創立了非營利性組織Waitlist Zero。當冠狀病毒大流行開始時,莫里森意識到挑戰試驗與腎臟捐贈之間的相似之處:這都是健康志願者接受少量風險的途徑拯救更脆弱的人的生命。 但是白宮冠狀病毒特別工作組的安東尼·富奇博士在7月表示,政府沒有計劃鼓勵或推進其自身的挑戰性研究,因為美國目前的感染率很高,可以迅速進行傳統試驗。 莫里森說,這種觀點是短視的,因為挑戰研究仍然可以加快多種第二代疫苗的開發,與第一批批准的疫苗相比,這種疫苗更安全,更有效,更容易在世界範圍內分發。 他還認為,美國官員不應該指望高感染率持續到今年年底。 進行挑戰性試驗還需要獲得美國食品藥品監督管理局(FDA)的批准,但該機構的一位官員在7月表示,這種方法可能會引起「道德上的胃灼熱」,因為「如果發生不良情況,您將無法完美解決」 。」 斯坦福大學經濟學家阿爾文·羅斯(Alvin Roth)說:「經濟學家習慣於權衡取捨。看來,至少在某些道德社區中,它們並非如此。」研究所謂的令人討厭的交易或許多人不認為的交易應該允許別人做。 他是15日諾貝爾獎獲得者之一,他們簽署了1Day Sooner敦促美國國立衛生研究院(NIH)為挑戰試驗做準備的公開信。 有關全文,鏈接等的更多信息,請訪問https://reason.com/video/let-volunteers-expose-themselves-to-covid-19-to-speed-up-a-vaccine製作,編寫和編輯賈斯汀·蒙蒂塞洛(Justin Monticello) 艾薩克·里斯(Isaac Reese)的圖片; Ian Keyser的音頻製作。 音樂:Quincas Moreira和Ian Post。 圖片:CHINE NOUVELLE / SIPA / Newscom; CHINE NOUVELLE / SIPA / Newscom; Tia Dufour /白宮/ ZUMA Press / Newscom; CHINE NOUVELLE / SIPA / Newscom; Stefani Reynolds-CNP / MEGA / Newscom; Michael Brochstein / Sipa USA / Newscom; Wissam Nassar新華社/ Newscom; John Green / ZUMAPRESS / Newscom; SUN / Newscom; SUN / Newscom; Rolf Vennenbernd / dpa / picture-alliance / Newscom; SAUL LOEB / UPI / Newscom; Kevin Dietsch-通過CNP / Newscom進行游泳池; Paul Hennessy / ZUMA Press / Newscom; Jose Luis CARRASCOSA Westend61 / Newscom; FrankHoermann / SVEN SIMON /圖片聯盟/ SvenSimon / Newscom; Fotogramma / IPA / ABACA / Newscom; John-Marshall Mantel / Polaris / Newscom; SOPA圖片/ Miguel Angel Valero / SOPA圖片/ Newscom。

29 comments
  1. I』d do it, I』m a low risk factor and I』d rather be tested on than health care workers who are actively doing all they can and involuntarily getting sick

  2. @ReasonTv This is absolutely the best information I have seen on testing https://youtu.be/jjx3doSskbU

    Please talk about types of testing, why PCR test have so many false positives the importance of not waiting until you need to be hospitalized to be treated even more so for the high risk groups.
    I would love for more doctors to talk about different types of testing, benefits, and early treatment options. NY TIMES article talking about up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
    tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus.

  3. Seems kinda nutty to me that they are concerned they won't have enough test subjects to test a cure for a disease that apparently doesn't have many test subjects.

  4. I have the perfect fix for the worry of test subject spreading covid. Just make them agree to wear a mask for 14 days since masks totally work. 😛

  5. Human experiments = t4 program they are using under age children in 3 world nations, for Pfizer Pharmaceuticals gain, by bill gates foundation! 6% deaths by covid = not a pandemic!

  6. It's like a twisted version of the trolley car problem. The trolley car problem asks if you would flip the switch on a runaway train so that it would divert away from killing 5 people tied to one train track but choosing to do so kills a single person tied to the diverted track. The ethical dilemma is that choosing to flip the switch may save a n increased number of lives since you have only 1 death vs 5 deaths but you become morally culpable for directly causing that death. By refusing challenge trials, we're effectively choosing to risk high risk people who will likely die if they catch COVID and who will catch it if we don't develop a vaccine before we're exposed. The people exposed in challenge trials will be young, healthy and at a very low risk of dying even if they catch COVID and they will be given more medical care than normal COVID patients in the wild since, being a medical trial, they'll be constantly evaluated by doctors throughout the process. Most importantly, they're all consenting.

    This is like a version of the trolley car problem where the train is heading towards thousands of people tied to the tracks and the choice is between letting it run them all over or diverting it to a track with a relatively small number of people on it, the small number of people aren't tied to the tracks and might very well be able to dodge the train even if it came their way (that is, they fit the profile of people who are unlikely to die of COVID even if they catch it and they've been given an experimental vaccine that hopefully keeps them from catching it). Furthermore, in this version of the trolley car problem, the people on the track you'd be diverting the train to are all screaming at you to please send the train their way instead of letting it hit the large mass of people and assure a higher body count.

  7. Would you like to know the plan the choice is yours. YouTube search Q plan to save the world remastered the video with a black background and blue Q. I think I can speak on behalf of everyone here. That would be something ALL us would love to see. YouTube search public enemy harder than you think lyrics

  8. Here's something you can chew on YouTube search Patriot hour for the JFK jr. Fans 17 at burial at Sea. What is the 17th letter of the alphabet? YouTube search aerial view of JFK memorial. Recognize that letter.

  9. Just remember there is no such thing as a throwaway child. no matter what race Creed color or country they come from. human trafficking is 30 billion dollar a year industry. YouTube search bezz believe ignorant.

  10. YouTube search Q alerts homepage the one with the red exclamation point. When you get there scroll down look at how sick your government is both sides of the aisle. You could probably cross reference these on Google search. How come citizen journalists have this information.one or two things you're lazy or your part of the cover up. Just because you're labeled professional journalist.Doesn't always mean you do a professional job. #Save our children #end child sex trafficking.YouTube search bold-faced lies becoming alive.

  11. Here's another one YouTube search NYPD officer explains frazzledrip scroll down to the video that says graphic warning. Then YouTube search Sidney Powell Anthony Weiner's laptop Hillsdale college. Scroll down to the one minute and 40 seconds video. She is referring to the video I just gave you.at that time it was an ongoing investigation and she couldn't come out and tell you exactly what was on that video. 9 out of the twelve officers that witnessed that video. Committed suicide? Sounds like another#epstein didn't kill himself . Just a conspiracy theory right reason?

  12. YouTube search don't call me Skippy. Then image search John podesta Gloria Vanderbilt Anderson Cooper. Do you notice the underground pool with the straps now look at the artwork from John podesta's home. Anderson Cooper is the son of Gloria Vanderbilt. No need to look here right reason just to conspiracy theory right? No worries I've got more.

  13. Dr Fauci works for Test Kits & Vaccines for Profit$. It』s not in his, or other Scientists best interest to inform Humanity the Fact Oxygen Therapies, or Angstrom Mineral Solutions are Cures against COVID-19, Viruses, Bacteria & other Diseases, because it』s not Profitable and they can』t Patent Natural Cures. Read, This Is A Bio-Attack Alert」, by Dr Robert B Strecker. Look up umojaresearch on Archive Dot org.
    Dr William F Koch gave the Cause & Cure of Cancer as early as 1918. All Viruses & Diseases have been cured by Natural Means & suppressed for over a Century.

  14. Would they need to infect people, if there was a raging pandemic going on? So there is not enough sick people to develop a vaccine that we desperately need to fight this raging pandemic. I hope you realize the dissonance

  15. I wouldn't do it personally, but I don't see any moral issue there if the people agreed to participate and they were told upfront about possible side effects and fail to cure.

Comments are closed.